Appendix O   the Toulmin vault at Sanderstead and a few naval Toulmins,

Sandersted. Croydon Hundred.                 

No. 44. In the Churchyard on the North side: "In this vault are deposited the

remains of Oliver Toulmin of London Merchant who died the 24th of July 1783 aged 62

years; and Anna Toulmin, wife of Oliver Toulmin who died the 29th August 1762 aged

38 years.   Richard Fellowes Toulmin, Robert Blincko Toulmin, Abraham Toulmin,

Oliver Toulmin, Margaret Toulmin, Oliver Blincko Toulmin, children of Oliver and

Anna Toulmin, who all died in their infancy.  Jane Toulmin, spinster, sister of

Oliver Toulmin who died the 5th of September 1756 aged 26 years. Anne Toulmin, wife

of Lieutenant John Toulmin of the Royal Navy and sister of Oliver Toulmin, who died

the 17th June 1770 aged 45 years. Mary Coward, widow of James Coward of London,

Merchant, and sister of Anna Toulmin, who died the 3rd of March 1791 aged 71 years.

Sukey Coward,spinster, daughter of James and Mary Coward, who died the 24th December

1764 aged 20 years."  (M&B, quoted JMH and Bond; but the latter has "widow of JOHN

COWARD"; Burke (Blencowe of the Hooke) gives James Coward.  I have visited

Sanderstead Church, but could not find this vault.)

 

This very informative inscription presents one problem: how was it that the wife of

Lt. John Toulmin was sister of Oliver Toulmin?  Obviously there are two possible

explanations (a) "sister" here means "sister-in-law" (as was common usage); (b) she

was in fact sister of Oliver and it was a Toulmin/Toulmin marriage (like the younger

Oliver and Charlotte).  In fact, Ann Toulmin m. John Toulmin on 18 Oct 1766 Christ

Ch. Spitalfields (see ***311134 and **132111) which seems to establish (b).  It's

true that Lt John Toulmin's will (given in full below) mentions "my Brother Oliver

Toulmin", but very much ranking after "my Brother William" ("Toulmin" omitted); so I

believe the former means "-in-law".  (It may have been a copying error: the Will of

William Toulmin **132133 contains "my son" as an undoubted error for "my

son-in-law".)  Oliver and Abraham both died after John, but their wills make no

mention of his family, nor of a William Toulmin.

  The ME/IGI tree, I believe, went astray in assuming (a), and also misquotes 1721

and 1756 as 1724 and 1765; however, I accept their attribution of "Abraham Toulmin

of Cartmel" as being a brother of Oliver.  This gives us a family of Toulmins to be

compared with the children of Richard Toulmin (or Tolmin) of Bolton-le-Sands (from

the Bolton registers), thus:

  Bolton                                      Sanderstead and ME/IGI

  Robert bapt. 6 Sep 1716 (presumably d. in infancy)

  Isabell bapt. 22 Mar 1718/9

  Oliver bapt. 9 July 1721                    Oliver d. 24 July 1783 aged 62

  Ann bapt. 26 Jan 1723/4                     Anne d. 17th June 1770 aged 45

  Abraham bapt. 30th July 1727                Abraham of Cartmel d. 1800 age unknown

  Jane  bapt. 22 May 1730                     Jane d. 5 Sep 1756 aged 26

  Robert bapt. 30 Nov 1731 (buried 27 Dec.1732)

The ages for Oliver and Jane match perfectly; there is a 1-year discrepancy for

Ann(e), which seems venial.  I think the agreement is good enough to justify the

assumption that the families are the same.  (Note also that Abraham of Cartmel had a

dau. Isabella.)

   The rest of the inscription is explained by the following tree (Burke, s.v.

Blencowe of The Hooke):

                   Thomas BLENCOWE =  Martha PERRISS

                           ________|______

                          |               |

  James COWARD m.1740 Mary BLENCOWE   Anna BLENCOWE m. 6 Jul 1751 Oliver TOULMIN

  d.before 1791   |   1720-1791       1724-1762     (at St Pauls) 1721-1783

                  |                                             

             Sukey COWARD (not in Burke)

             1744-1764

ME90 adds that James Coward was of St Peter ad Vincula, merchant, and m. Mary at

St Paul's Cathedral.

 

   It seems worth remarking that the Lancaster registers have an entry for the

marriage of Tho Toulmin of Preston and Elizabeth Coward, 30 Dec 1717 (WillT).

Tho. could have been the Thomas, b. 1692, whom I believe to have been a younger

brother of Richard, and so uncle of Oliver; there may be some remote connection.

   The inscription makes no mention of surviving children of Anna and Oliver; but it

seems well-established that their children surviving infancy were Susannah

***3111331 and Richard ***3111332: see the details given there.  A residual problem

is the claim that Susannah's father is said to have been "Barrister-at-Law and

Master in Chancery" (Burke, and Flood, applied to **13218), which does not sound

like our "Merchant and Navy Agent".  I think this must be an error: see the

discussion under **13218.

 

   I have devoted considerable efforts to trying to trace Lt John Toulmin, so far

without success.  Following is what I have discovered about him and his family: the

tree shows the people involved.  The identification of George as a brother is

hypothetical.

      ______________________________________________________________

     |                                    |                         |

 Lt John Toulmin 1737-1780        William Toulmin, surgeon   George Toulmin, R.N.

  =(1)(1766) Anne Toulmin 1724-1770              d.c. 1805   d. before 1776?

   (2)(1771) Mary Field ?-1805 (brother Jarrard Field)

     |

     |           William Osborn Sr d.c. 1803 = Margaret ?

     |                                       |

  Mary Toulmin 1775-c.1800 =(1792) William Osborn Jr d.c.1803

                    _______|_______

                   |               |

               Mary Osborn    Emily Osborn

 

   Lt John Toulmin was wrongly identified by Stewart Toulmin (per Flood) as the

eldest son of the Rev. Thomas Toulmin of Ravenstonedale, and by ME/IGI as a brother

of Abraham Toulmin ***311136.   Neither of these is possible.

  He entered RN 10 Jan 1756, no. 341 in Muster Book of "Gosport" (PRO Adm.36/5649,

f.192): "Volr. Portsmo. AB until 18th Jan then Mid".  On leave (marked "p" in the

muster) 25 Mar to 5 April; drew £3.0.0 Bounty during Mar-Apr 1756 (Adm.36/5650,

f.14). "Gosport" had a complement of 200; presumably a frigate, probably of 28 guns

(v. William Spavens, cited below, p.88).

  Passed exam. for Lt 20 Feb 1760 (Adm.107/5, f.195), then "more than 23 years of

Age" [agreeing with marriage licence, see under ***311134] & "at sea more than 6

yrs, part in Merchants Service".  Career to then:

 Ships      Qualities        y  m  w  d        Date      PRO Adm.36/

Gosport       Able           0  0  1  1        10.1.1756   5649

              Mids           2  3  1  3        18.1.1756   5649-50

Saphire        "             0  2  3  3       [28.4.1758]  6751

Experiment     "             0  6  2  1       [22.7.1758]  5461-2(?)

Torbay         "             1  0  2  5       [ 6.2.1759]  6837-9

   Total                     4  0  2  6

 (Dates in [] inferred, do not check exactly with cert. date.) "Certificates from

Captains Edwardes, Allen, Owen, & Keppel". Keppel was in "Torbay" (74 guns) from

1756 to 1761. "During the summer & autumn of 1759 the Torbay was again attached to

the grand fleet off Brest under Hawke, and on 20 Nov was the leading ship in the

battle of Quiberon Bay, and was closely engaged with the French Thesee, which

ultimately sank" (DNB s.v. Keppel).  Listed as Lt, 4.11.1762 (Pitcairn-J, with no

further detail at all).

   His will, below,  states he was "on board the Albion Transport" 20 Aug 1776, and

ME/IGI lists him as "commanding Albion", and ME92 as "of the Essex".  I failed to

find him on HMS "Albion" (Adm.36/8290,8294); but that Albion was a large warship

(complement 600, about the size of "Torbay"), not a transport, while there was also

a Hired Tender "Albion", at least from 26 Jul 1779 to 12 April 1783 (Adm.36/9246).

She had a complement of only 12 non-naval and 12 naval, and was commanded (from 15

Nov 1779) by a Lt Obad. Newell: no Toulmin. If she existed earlier, and the muster

book has been lost, it is possible Lt John Toulmin was in fact commanding her in

1776, though not during his later "service in America" (she was based at Plymouth).

However, the probability is that he was simply in transit to his ship.

His will, in full, reads:

      To wit.  Being in Bodily health and leaving my affairs at Home unsettled and

      going on a hazardous Service tomorrow Morning I think it necessary I should

      now declare in the presence of the two underneath Witnesses that I leave

      every thing I may die possessed of at home or abroad to Mary my Wife during

      her natural life - in case of her death to my child Mary but should my Wife

      be pregnant and the Child live then to be equally distributed between them.

      Should all these die before my Brother William then my desire is that he

      should take possession of the whole and should he also die Then to my

      Brother Oliver Toulmin & his Survivors and I hereby appoint him my sole

      Executor. In Witness wherof I on the other side set my Hand and Seal  Jno

      Toulmin (SS).  Dated on board the Albion Transport the 20th August 1776.

      Witness.  John Inglis, Robert Inglis, John Prideaux, Phillip Parrall.

       This Will was proved at London the fifteenth day of April in the Year of

      our Lord one thousand seven hundred and eighty... by the Oath of Oliver

      Toulmin Esquire ... (PRO PROB11/1064 f.219)

   As noted above, I believe "brother Oliver Toulmin" (note the surname) meant

"brother-in-law". Certainly ***311133 is meant, and his will, 1783, mentions

no brother William, nor does the Bolton-le-Sands PR.

   "Deaths ... Feb.17. At West-Ham in Essex, Lieut. John Toulmin of his majesty's

navy, who arrived from America only a few days before, where he had been employed

some years." (GM 1780 p.154, mis-indexed as Towlinin).  

 

   For his first marriage, see under ***311134.  His second was on 10 Aug 1771 (PR,

West Ham, per JMH; licence ("Feild") 9 Aug 1771, MLic/VicGen); "John Toulmin Esq to

Miss Mary Field of Westham" (GM per WillT); "sister of Gerrard Field" (ME90).  She

was of Adam St Adelphi, 1796 (ME90); but in will dated 1802 (admon. 1805) "of

Lambeth, widow", and she desired to be buried with her daughter in West Ham (PRO

PROB11/1430 f.282: cited here as "Mary's will"; it names her brother as Jarrand or

Jarrard, and one witness was Mary North of 6 Bridge Row [Road?] Lambeth).  Her

estate included £2300 3 reduced Bank annuities and Household goods & furniture sold

£25, Ready money under £3, Wearing apparel under £15 (PRO PROB31/982/793,

Declaration by Administratrix, Margaret Osborn, Widow).

   Their daughter, Mary, was bap. Shalford [Surrey], 25 Nov 1775 (BC-T/IGI); the

location is unexpected, but Shalford, just S. of Guildford, may have been a

stopping-point for John, Mary, or the couple between London and Portsmouth.   She

was living in 1796, bur. West Ham before 1802 (see above).

   This daughter, Mary Toulmin, m. William Osborn, East Wickham, Kent 24 Sep 1792

(per EM, 20 Oct 1986, source unknown). Living 1796.  "The younger", Wine merchant,

of the Adelphi (ME90); son of "William Osborn the Elder of Adam Street Adelphi in

the Strand, Hotel Keeper" (Mary's will) . (There was an Adelphi pier and wharfs

where Adelphi Terrace is now, at the bottom of Adam St.)  Two daughters, Mary &

Emily Osborn, are mentioned in Mary's will, which states Mary was the elder (she was

bequeathed "my family Bible" and had first choice of two chests of drawers). Both

William Osborns seem to have died between the making (2 Nov 1802) and probate (2 Aug

1805) of Mary's will, as Margaret Osborn is described in the latter as "next of kin"

of the girls.

   Unless there was a close relationship, it is an extraordinary coincidence

that George Toulmin entered RN just 2 days after John, 12 Jan 1756, no. 193 on

Muster Book of "Dispatch", a sloop, capt. David Edwardes, complement of 80 (PRO

Adm.36/5396, f.11, 28, 50, 67, 83, 93, 110, 132, 138, 147).  No details of age,

origin, or place of enlistment are given.  From 9 July to 29 Sep 1756, "Dispatch"

was at the Downs, Sheerness, and The Nore. f.147 shows transfer to "Seaford", on 30

Sep 1756; his discharge ticket was no. /198/MV, "delivered to Pty". Passed exam. for

Lt 2 Sep 1761 (Adm.6/87 & 107/5 f.387): "more than 21 years of Age & at sea more

than 6 yrs, part in Merchants Service".  [If he was just 21, he was b. about 1740.]

Career to then:

 Ships       Qualities        y  m  w  d     Date     PRO Adm.36/

 Dispatch      Able           0  9  1  4     12.1.1756   5396

 Seaford       Able           0  5  3  1     30.9.1756   6711-2

               Mids           1  3  0  2    [22.3.1757]

 Assistance    Mids           2  0  3  5    [24.6.1758]  4890-2

 Richmond      Able           0  1  1  0    [20.7.1760]  6494-5

               Masrs. Mate    1  0  0  6    [27.8.1760]

                              5  7  2  4

[First line should be 0 8 2 4 & total 5 7 2 4 is 3 days short, though the detailed

dates work out exactly right.]  "Certificates from Capt. Edwardes and Elphinston".

"Richmond" was a 32-gun ship, capt. Elphinston, that returned from N. America to

England towards the end of 1760, and in Feb 1761 drove ashore near the Hague &

destroyed a French frigate; in 1762 she was involved in an expedition against Havana

(DNB, s.v. Elphinston).  "Master's Mate" = Assistant Navigating Officer (SOED);

commonly a step between Mids and Lt.  "In the Royal Navy they must first go as

Midshipmen, in which station they serve about three years, and then are sometimes

made Masters' Mates, and from thence rise to be Masters or Lieutenants, though

frequently they act as Cadets or Acting Lieutenants for a while". (William Spavens

"Memoirs of a Seafaring Life", Folio Society, 2000, first pub.1796).

  Not in Pitcairn-J: perhaps never promoted? John Toulmin, above, had to wait nearly

3 years.  I know nothing further of George; if he and John  were brothers, the

absence of George from John's 1776 will suggests that he died before then.

 

   It seems very probable that "brother William" of John's will was "William Toulmin

of Prescott Street Goodmans Fields in the county of Middlesex Surgeon" named as

executor and trustee in Mary's will, though she does not identify him as a

brother-in-law; and this surgeon was certainly the one I list as App.D,42.  He left

a Will, proved 17 Jan 1806: "I William Toulmin of Prescott Street Goodmans Fields in

the City of London Apothecary ... bequeath unto my beloved wife Mary Toulmin all my

Money Securities for Money Goods Chattels Estate and Effects ...and I do nominate

constitute and appoint Richard Toulmin of Surrey Street Strand in the County of

Middlesex Esquire to be Executor ... this 30th day of April 1804".  He was "sick of

body" when he made the will, and may have died before Mary's will was proved, or at

least been too ill to serve as executor.  The lack of any mention of his

sister-in-law or great-nieces in his will is no evidence against the relationship:

he would have been aware that they were well provided for.  His wife may have been

Mary Howson, m.1758: see Lond*134.

 

 I might as well note here that Oliver Toulmin did have a nephew, Edward

(***3111365, son of Abraham Toulmin of Mireside), who was a Seaman, HMS Superbe, at

his death in 1781.  Another naval Toulmin was Arthur Toulmin, d. 1798 Ship's

Corporal HMS Culloden, last belonging to HMS Hyena; all I know of him was that he

had a wife Susannah Toulmin, widow and sole executor (App.B section 4c). Still

another was George Toulman "o'rwise Loton or Powlett", seaman HMS 'Childers',

bachelor, d.1808; admon to John Toulman natural & lawful father (App.B section 4c).